客服系统
  • 我为什么担忧斯坦福

  • 时间:2013-08-10 15:01:02 点击:0次
  •     《斯坦福之终结》这篇文章发表后,引起了许多国人的强烈反响。同是一名斯坦福学生,为何作者会如此消极地评价母校?据此,作者提出了两个观点。首先,教授投资学生项目背后潜藏着巨大隐患,然而这一问题还没有完善的解决方案;其次,随着MOOC(大规模开放在线课程)的盛行,斯坦福作为其推动者之一,从此课程数字化,教授随之辞职创业,作者担忧斯坦福校园将不复存在。
         
    On Monday evening, I asked, in a blog post, whether we are approaching The End of Stanford. The Wall Street Journal had just published a story about a new start-up called Clinkle, which has, as the paper mildly put it, “deep roots” in the university. More than a dozen students have left school to work at it. Professors have invested. An emeritus dean has advised it. The president of the university, John Hennessy, who had a career as a technology entrepreneur and who now sits on the boards of Google and Cisco—companies which could reasonably be expected to one day compete with or acquire the start-up—was the academic advisor of the C.E.O. The story made me wonder where Stanford ends and Silicon Valley begins. Or, put cheekily, is Stanford now just a tech incubator with a football team?
     
    Many on campus liked neither my question, nor my joke. I also got a lot of personal feedback from students. I’m a Stanford graduate, so how could I fail to understand that it still produces Rhodes Scholars and has Rodin statues? Yes, many people say, influence on campus continues to shift from techies to fuzzies, as they're called. But the university has given the world H.P., Cisco, Google, Netflix, Instagram, and Snatchtchat. Put all the companies founded by alums on an island, and they’d make something like the tenth largest economy in the world. (I’ve co-founded a Vally-backed one too.) All good, right? “Why so down now?” asked one commentator on the original blog post.
     
    Here’s why. Start with the complicated power dynamics that arise when professors invest in student companies. Does the student who let the professor put money in expect a good grade? What if the company falters? What if the student doesn’t want the professor to invest? Does another student who wants to start a competitive company need to fear a bad grade? There are gradations, and it matters, of course, whether a professor invests when a student is currently enrolled in his class—or might enroll in a future one. But financial relationships are charged and emotional and universities need to be very careful. Stanford, a university spokesman told me, deals with these potential financial conflicts by requiring internal disclosure and departmental review. Is that enough?
     
    What about students dropping out? Of course, it should happen—from time to time. No one begrudges Bill Gates leaving Harvard. There are moments to pursue entrepreneurial dreams; Stanford, to its credit, allows students to stop out and then return. But one student leaving is not the same as a dozen going off in a block. And a dozen students leaving for a company whose founder worked closely with the university’s president is even now extraordinary. Will the computer-science department become something like the Kentuckey basketball team?
     
    And here’s the biggest question. Stanford is in the middle of a massive experiment in online education.  In 2011, a hundred and sixty thousand students around the world signed up to take a class that the university offered online. Following the success, the professor quit to work at an education start-up. Hennessy has talked eloquently and extensively about his desire to take much of what is analog about Stanford and make it digital. “There’s a tsunami coming,” he told Ken Auletta, in an interview for a feature in this magazine.
     
    This is all very fine—exciting, even. But it’s also fraught. The university is likely to change more in the next ten years than in any previous decade. Other educational institutions will follow its lead. The choices it makes will also, quite possibly, enrich companies around Silicon Valley—and Stanford knows well by now that wealthy alumni write checks to their alma mater. The lines between Silicon Valley and Stanford are ever more steadily blurring. When the needs of education conflict with the prerogatives of headlong enrichment, which will Stanford choose?
         
         
    感谢关注瑞知教育!想要了解更多资讯,请添加瑞知教育微信服务号rzivy-edu,以及拨打咨询电话020-22057806。来电咨询即可获赠价值3800元的个性化学校推荐服务!
  • [返回列表]
  • 本科

  • 美国高水平的教育保证了美国在世界范围内的全方位领先地位。

 

 

 

 

  • 探究美国大学职能发展的实用主义

  • 教育受社会经济、文化等因素制约,但文化是制约教育发展的根本所在。美国文化影响美国教育的发展,并在此基础上产生了美国大学教育的实用主义。

 

 

 

 

瑞知学子在康奈尔:始料未及的开头和结尾
在瑞知老师眼中,每一位学子身上都能发掘出其独特的魅力。例如2016年录取到康奈尔大学计算机科学专业的
一份很污的报告:哈佛大学2016届本科毕业生调查
哈佛大学刚刚公布了该校2016届的本科毕业生调查报告。本次调查由著名的哈佛校园媒体《The Harv
面对拉低民族智商的高考作文题,更坚定了出国留学的信心!
今年的高考作文题又火了。同样是检验高中毕业生的写作能力,中国高考题的水准,比美国大学的申请文书差了不
瑞知教育2015-16年奖学金录取榜:总额破700万美元
2015 - 16年,瑞知教育的美国留学申请成绩斐然。有斯沃斯莫尔学院、戴维森学院等顶级文理学院,也

瑞知教育官方微信

技术支持:讯博网络